How
a 'fat fish' finally slipped through the net By Kim Sengupta (The Independent, London)
3 March 2000
It was 5 October 1998 and General Augusto Pinochet had just
taken tea at his old friend Baroness Thatcher's home in Belgravia, central London. As he
was being driven away he spotted an old man begging by the roadside. Pointing, he said to
his bodyguards: "Look, fat fish". It was a particularly cruel private joke.
"Fat fish" was a term used by the Dina, the secret police created by Pinochet,
for the political prisoners killed in one of his torture camps and thrown to the sea for
the fish.
Pinochet was happy. The hospitality of Lady Thatcher who called him "my
general" had, he believed, confirmed his standing in Britain. This was in
stark contrast to most of western Europe, where he was unwelcome. Just a few days
previously there had been an embarrassing snub from the French government, which had
refused him permission to return to his father's ancestral roots. That refusal was to
prove a ticking bomb for Pinochet.
In Britain, on the other hand, he had been a regular and welcome visitor during the
Thatcher and Major years. It was a mutually beneficial relationship. One of the lucrative
perks General Pinochet had given himself had been a key role in arms purchases by the
Chilean military, and he had been a good customer for British firms.
His shopping, along with the obligatory trips to Harrods, Burberry's and Fortnum and
Mason, was to take in the Royal Ordnance. His opponents claim he was hoping for a hefty
commission for the purchase of three Type-22 frigates bound for the Chilean Navy. It was
his second visit since Labour came to power and, as with the previous occasion, he had
received a VIP welcome at Heathrow airport on 22 September.
The general was due to undergo minor back surgery and he was advised that he should
combine his trip to Britain with a visit to the London Clinic in Harley Street to have
this done.
It was there, 11 days after tea with the Thatchers, that Pinochet's past caught up with
him in the most unexpected way. A midnight visit from Scotland Yard detectives led to his
arrest, following an extradition request from the Spanish magistrate Baltasar Garzon. The
general was to face charges of murder, torture and hostage-taking. Garzon had learned
about his presence in London from French newspaper reports of his unsuccessful attempt to
get into France.
The arrest led to uproar. In Britain it opened up old battle lines between right and
left, with the latter gaining some unexpected advocates. Peter Mandelson declared it was
"gut-wrenching" that "such a brutal dictator" should be claiming
diplomatic immunity and Tony Blair was to describe the old dictator as
"unspeakable". But these were isolated cries from New Labour's radical past. The
official party line was that the issue was a purely legal and not a political matter. It
was left to backbenchers like Jeremy Corbyn to carry on the campaign against Pinochet.
The general, in the meantime was being portrayed as a latter-day Dreyfus by his
supporters. The common thread linking Pinochet's British supporters was often Lady
Thatcher. She, and former chancellor Lord Lamont, were to become his most vocal advocates.
Abroad, the Pinochet supporters comprised an eclectic bunch including the Pope and the
Dalai Lama. There was also strong lobbying from the Americans, especially former president
George Bush and Henry Kissinger, apprehensive about prolonged public airing of the role
the CIA had taken in Chile in overthrowing the government of Salvador Allende.
Within days of his arrest he was asked to leave the London Clinic and then the
Grovelands Priory Hospital, before a £10,000-a-month home was rented for him by the
Chilean government on the exclusive Wentworth estate.
The Pinochet camp was convinced that it would only be a short time before Jack Straw
was forced to release him. Around £3m was raised in Chile, and huge sums were sent over
and distributed in Britain to mount a propaganda campaign on the general's behalf.
Hundreds of supporters were flown to Britain to show their "spontaneous
loyalty". They picketed outside Belmarsh magistrates court, in south-east London,
when he appeared there. The PR firm Bell Pottinger was reportedly given a £200,000
contract by the Pinochet Foundation to push his case.
The legal battles began with a victory for the general in the High Court when three
judges, including the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Bingham, ruled that he had immunity from
prosecution as a former head of state. The appeal to the House of Lords by the Crown
Prosecution Service, on behalf of the Spanish government, was seen as mainly a paper
exercise. Instead, the Law Lords voted by three to two that the former dictator, on his
83rd birthday, should face extradition.
The decision was greeted as a landmark in international human rights laws. The news of
it brought spontaneous applause from MPs in parliaments across Europe.
But then came another twist in the tale with the revelation that Lord Hoffmann, who had
voted against Pinochet, had links with Amnesty International, which had appeared in court
to press for extradition. Despite the fact that Pinochet's own solicitors, Kingsley
Napley, had donated money to Amnesty, the Lords decision was set aside.
In the fresh hearing that followed, the Lords upheld their previous decision by six to
one, however they severely restricted the scope of the extradition action by ruling out
many of the charges and inviting Mr Straw to reconsider. He did so, and allowed the
extradition to continue. At that stage, the Home Secretary was the hero of the human
rights groups and demonised by the Pinochistas. Times soon changed.
Pinochet lost round after round of his legal battles. A crucial loss, at Bow Street
magistrates court, where stipendary magistrate Ronald Bartles ruled that additional
charges put forward by Judge Garzon could be admitted, was followed by stories that the
general's health had deteriorated badly.
The former dictator's path home was now secure. A further legal victory by Belgium,
another state seeking extradition, and the human rights groups, this time against Mr
Straw, could not prevent the Home Secretary using his "discretion" to free
Pinochet.
The Pinochet affair ended with the impassioned recriminations with which it had begun.
But the former dictator returns home a humiliated figure, whose brutality while in power
has been held up to public opprobrium. As one human rights activist said yesterday:
"We regret he did not face trial for his crimes. But what has happened in the last 16
months has put Pinochet where he belongs, in the dustbin of history." |